Monthly Archives: February 2012

Big Bubble Battles

After watching my Bandwagon Team – Xavier – throw away last night’s 11-point lead in a game that would have all but punched their “Dance Card,” I was inspired to see how the bubble is shaping up.  So I went to the Bracket Matrix (which has certainly made its way into my favorites as I’ve visited it about 142 times in the last three days) and looked at the final 10-seed, the 11-seeds, the 12-seeds, the First Four Out, and the Next Four Out.  Then I went through each team’s schedule to see which games had high-impact potential on the resumes of these teams.

When you check out the picture at the bottom of the post, know that I’ve highlighted some games in three ways – Win and In, Bubble Battle, and Opportunity for Improvement.  I was going to do a “Lose and Out” category, but with these teams, basically any game not highlighted in one of the three previous categories is a “Lose and Out” game. Here’s a category-by-category breakdown of the high-impact games.

CSU - not good enough yet

Win and In
February 29
Cincinnati vs Marquette:  The Bearcats are actually favored by 1.5.  I would think it’s rare that a team is actually favored in a game of “win and in” status.

Northwestern vs Ohio State: Unlike Cincinnati, Northwestern is an underdog – one of 6.5 points.  Despite the Buckeyes’ most recent game being a home loss to Wisconsin, they would still represent an impressive enough win for Northwestern to make the field.

Colorado State vs UNLV: UNLV is a team solidly in the Dance (as evidenced by their standing as a 5-seed in the Matrix).  They’re a small 2.5 point favorite as they try to improve their seeding position against a Rams team that desperately needs a Top 50 win to impress the Committee.

Continue Reading the Big Bubble Battles

NCAA Tourney Predictions by Conference

I’d love to take the time to do a whole Bracketology, but I’ll leave the bracketing and seeding to the experts – particularly my guy The Bracket Project and his fabulous Bracket Matrix. Instead of doing what they all do and projecting the field “if the season ended today,” I’ll be taking a stab at which teams will be in the Dance when the season actually does end. We’ll go conference-by-conference for the sake of organization. I’ll put teams in four categories: Locks, All But In, Bubble, and Bubble Envy.

Ohio State is still the best team in the B1G.

B1G
Locks: Ohio State, Michigan State, Michigan, Wisconsin, Indiana
All But In: Purdue
Bubble: Northwestern
Bubble Envy: Illinois, Minnesota
Prediction:
Ohio State wins the Conference Tournament and gets a 1. Sparty gets themselves a 2. Michigan and Wisconsin both combine to make the 4-line the slowest seed group of all time. Indiana gets a 5. Purdue is a dangerous 10. Northwestern ends 7-11 and misses the Dance yet again. Illinois and Minnesota shouldn’t even be garnering attention at this point.

Big 12
Locks: Kansas, Missouri, Baylor
All But In: Kansas State
Bubble: Iowa State, Texas
Bubble Envy: None
Prediction:
Kansas wins the Conference Tournament and gets to the 1-line, bringing Missouri down to a 2. Baylor and its elite talent yet puzzling inability to compete with elite teams stay on the 3-line. Kansas State is an 8. Iowa State is a 10. Texas finds a way to get in to expose Rick Barnes as a fraud of a coach once again.

Continue Reading the Predictions

How About Some Linkage?

This time of year, Bracketologies are being cranked out and changed by the day.  What comes with the speculation are many articles on which teams are great, which are on the bubble, why the RPI stinks, and many other articles that remind us it’s nearly time for the Big Dance.  Here are just a few I’ve come across recently for your enjoyment, along with some of the better excerpts from each…

Why the RPI still hovers over the selection process by Matt Norlander on CBS Sports’ Eye on College Basketball blog.

The RPI is the peanut butter that keeps the primary data smudged together for the Selection Committee. It still permeates the process. And the NCAA still wants to deny that. The NCAA likes to say bringing up a team’s specific RPI ranking doesn’t often come up when debating two teams’ inclusion or seeding. While that’s true, from the outset, the organization, presentation and general data on a team is dressed up in an RPI shirt with an RPI hat and a cute pair of RPI gloves.

Continue Reading the Links

Fun With Numbers – RPI Favorites vs KenPom Favorites

In order to craft what I did here in my comparison of RPI vs Pomeroy, I made a chart showing every team in the Top 60 either the RPI or KenPom (or both, of course).  Then I subtracted the KenPom rank from the RPI rank to get a delta value.  Teams that have a negative value are what I consider “overrated” as they’re ranked higher by the RPI.  Teams with a positive value are “underrated” – better at KenPom than RPI.  Here’s a breakdown of the most overrated and underrated teams.

I like the teams below the red line better.

So which teams are better?  I suppose Seth Davis would choose the teams above the red line, but I think he’s in the minority.  I did some research, and these teams are 5-5 against each other so the head-to-head argument is out the window.

While it’s a very small sample size, if you read my post on New Mexico, it sure seemed like KenPom was correct on their rankings – especially the year they were one of the worst 3-seeds ever and got beaten by a higher-ranked-by-KenPom (and 11-seeded!) Washington team.

But the purpose of this post isn’t to give my opinion on which teams I like better.  It was simply meant to be informative and give you something to consider when you see any of these teams play in the coming weeks.

The Curious Case of the New Mexico Lobos

Weird blazer. Weird four-year run.

Just by looking at their stats and bios, New Mexico Seniors A.J. Hardeman and Philip McDonald appear to have had pretty nondescript,  routine careers.  After all, Hardeman averaged a career-high 7.6 ppg last senior and McDonald a career-high 10.9.  But if you look deeper, these players have been on a four-year ride as improbable as any other one could ever imagine.

The Lobos have been among the most underrated or the most overrated teams in the entire nation in each of the past four seasons.  Let’s take a look at New Mexico in those seasons.  To do so, I’ll be using my trusty KenPom ratings.  I consider the “overrated” teams those that are seeded very favorably despite low KenPom ratings. “Underrated” teams have a KenPom rating that dictates a higher seed level than they earned.

2008-09: KenPom Rating – 39.  Seed – n/a (not in tournament field)
The 08-09 Lobos went 12-4 in a conference rated 7th-best at KenPom.  Their overall record of 21-10 included no losses to any team ranked worse than 146th by Pomeroy.  A first round loss in the Mountain West Tourney, however, placed them firmly on the bubble.  Only five teams ranked higher by Pomeroy missed the field (including, ironically, conference foe San Diego State).  On the other side of the coin, 11 teams ranked lower than them were invited to the tournament as part of multiple-bid leagues.

Continue Reading